Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Tragedy in Virginia

As I write on April 17 it is hard to think without thinking about the violence at Virginia Tech yesterday. We live in a violent society, a violent world. Despite admonitions in all of the worlds great religions against killing we know that murder has been welling up in the human heart from the very beginning. We find this expressed in the stories of our first parents how jealousy and hatred built up between their children and Cain rose up and killed Abel. We quickly learn two things from God’s dealing with this situation, first that God condemns murder, and second that God’s solution is not to murder (or execute) the murderer. The mark of Cain was given not to condemn him, but to protect him from others who might take his life.

While the problem of violence is not new, I believe that violence and particularly murder has become a greater problem in modern times than ever before. Despite the spread of education and “civilization” in our modern world the more civilized societies of modern times seem more violent than those of the more “primitive” past. The scale of the genocide in the Nazi holocaust was unprecedented in the previous history of the world; what is going on in Darfur is equally tragic. In a matter of days in August 1945 just two bombs killed thousands of Japanese in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, an act of violence unparalleled in the history of the world. Yesterday we saw a single individual kill at least 33 people in a matter of hours. There may have been some motive for two of the killings that have been described as arising out of a love relationship, but the rest of the killings seem totally random.

What is the cause of such widespread violence; what can we do to change the direction of history?

I immediately think of three modern trends that contribute to the problem.
  • One is the widespread availability of guns and explosives. It is much easier for a single individual or small group to perpetrate deadly violence with a gun or bomb than it ever was with clubs, knives, or the bow and arrow. While better control over the availability of firearms is not the sole answer (even today the mayor of Nagasaki, Japan was critically shot and Japan has very strict gun control) it is part of the answer. In a Presbyterian News Service article about religious reactions to the Virginia Tech tragedy the following comments speak to this concern: In Geneva, the general secretary of the World Alliance of Reformed Churches, the Rev. Setri Nyomi said: “We pray to God that the families, friends and colleagues of the victims will some day find healing, ... We pray also for the United States of America and all nations as they struggle to overcome the temptation to rely on arms and as they work to find true security for all their peoples.”
    In New York, National Council of Churches General Secretary Bob Edgar echoed Nyomi’s call for an end to violence. “The escalation of gun violence compels us to call for an end to the manufacture and easy distribution of such instruments of destruction,” he said.
    “A faith that expresses compassion for all God’s children is opposed to violence in all forms,” Edgar continued, noting that numerous U.S. faith leaders “have spoken up continually about the epidemic of gun violence in our country. Despite repeated calls from faith and community leaders to Congress and presidents nothing ever seems to get done to stem the tide.”
  • A second cause of violence in our society is a whole culture that both glamorizes violence and promotes it as a viable solution to personal and political problems. From mainstream television and movies to video games and rap music the media glamorizes violence, makes it seem normative, and worst of all perpetuates the myth that it is an acceptable, even necessary way to solve problems. The wildly popular television series 24 (which I love as a drama and hate to miss, but at the same time I hate with a passion as a propaganda piece) is as guilty as is the president of our nation of perpetuating the myth that we can solve the world’s problems by resort to violence and warfare. If violence is the answer to terrorism, oppressive governments, and civil war then how can we tell individuals that it is not a legitimate way to deal with their personal problems?
  • Third, all the stress of living in a fast paced, urbanized, highly competitive and anonymous world increase the likelihood that individuals will loose hold of their sanity, their good sense, and their moral inhibitions.

    Is it not the Church’s business to promote a counter culture of peace and reconciliation, love and understanding? This underlines the importance of the simple act of lighting a candle for peace to stand as a beacon of hope calling us and all the world from darkness to light, from violence to peace. It is our business to build community instead of anonymity, to teach people to live deeper than the stresses of the present moment, to get in touch with the basic values of life and with the one who brings meaning and value to all of our lives.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

While I believe gun violence is abhorrent, I do not believe that additional gun control is warranted or needed or would have prevented the Virginia shooting. The guns obtained by the student were obtained legally after the required background check and waiting period. I strongly opposed gun bans of any kind.

To put things into perspective, gun violence causes and average of 30,000 deaths each year in the United States. Medical mal-practice in the United States causes and average of 195,000 deaths per year . . . OUCH, now that is an epidemic!!! Perhaps we should attack the rights of patients with the vehemence with which we attack the rights of gun owners. Perhaps we should call an end to the manufacture and distribution of incompetent doctors.

I agree that there is too much violence on TV and in music and video games. I do not support the creation of a system of censorship, but do think we should limit its availability to children.

And I agree that war should be avoided by all means possible (as should all acts of violence) but it is not necessarily unjust. How far do we take pacifism? If someone were committing an act of violence on a friend or family member would you stand by and do nothing? Would it have been just for a police sniper to the Virginia gunman to save other lives? This brings to mind the parable of the good Samaritan. A man is beaten and robbed and left for dead by the side of the road. The self-righteous leaders of the temple passed him by, but a common Samaritan (a group of people generally despised by law abiding Jews) helped him out. I've often wondered what Jesus would have us do if we witnessed the man being robbed and beaten. Would he have us stand by and watch the man possibly be murdered? Or would he have us help the man on the spot? Which is the greater act of compassion and love? Did not Jesus say "No one has greater love than this, that someone would lay down his life for his friends." (John 15:13). Now, I'm not saying that Jesus would want us to kill (if the robber died in the act of protecting the man that would be ok), but I disagree with Pastor Terry's point that war or violence is never necessary (as extrapolated from comments about the TV show 24 being a tool for spreading presidential propaganda that war and violence is sometimes necessary). If an oppressive government is committing acts of genocide how many common people have to robbed, beaten up, and killed before our self-righteous leaders act? 14,000 (Serbia)? 200,000 (Darfur)? 800,000 (Rwanda)? 1,000,000 (Saddam Hussein)? 3,000,000 (Khmer Rouge in Cambodia) 7,000,000 (Nazi Germany)? 20,000,000 (Stalin)? How many of Gods children have to die at the hands of evil men before we work up the courage to lay down our lives for our friends? Have we Christians not learned how to LOVE that much that we are complacent enough to sit behind our walls and complain about injustice but never do what it takes to carry our wounded brothers to safely? Do we Christians not know that Satan walks up and down the earth sowing evil seeds and it is our responsibility to fight against him? "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." (Edmund Burke).

Sorry for digressing, anyway . . . I agree that our global society breeds acts of violence such as the Virginia shooting. As Pastor Terry mentioned the Nagasaki mayor was shot. Then there was the subway gassing in Japan, the train blown apart in Spain, the school that was blown up in Russia, and other school shooting all over the world. Remember, most of these countries have very strict gun laws. (I had links to support these statements but they could not be added in the comment box)

The church absolutely MUST promote peace and reconciliation in action as well as rhetoric, but it must also accept that wars will and must occur. Jesus himself told us this, "You are going to hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not alarmed, because these things must take place, but the end is not yet." (Matthew 24:6). Read also Hebrews 11:32-40. We must cry out for peace and comfort the broken hearted and care for the sick and the orphans and visit the imprisoned. We must do this because we are the arms of Jesus and we all need a hug.

Ritch Davis
--
At one moment I might announce concerning a nation or kingdom that I will uproot, tear down, and destroy it. However, if that nation I have made an announcement about, turns from its evil, I will not bring the disaster I had planned. ~Jeremiah 18:7-8